Michael Niewöhner wrote: > It feels this is the usual "but what if *someone* out there *needs/wants* > it?".
Not quite, it's "why delete it if it might work?". This is still ideological of course, so the question becomes what we find valuable. I e.g. do not consider it at all valuable to only keep code for the last n Intel platform generations, in spite of knowing that only those have any value whatsoever for the vast majority of coreboot users. But coreboot is not a company and thus not restricted to only value market demand or otherwise proven utility. We can have other values and I do. > Does anyone know if the platform still works, at all? Does anyone know that the platform *doesn't* work? Are there any practical concerns whatsoever? For me, at a very minimum both those questions must have a yes answer to qualify deletion. Reducing scope is always satisfying but that's not a good reason to delete platforms. It is of course very easy to manufacture practical concerns, but maybe that's a fair enough hurdle for arbitrary deletion... //Peter _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
