On 21.06.23 01:07, Peter Stuge wrote: > (sorry if you receive this twice) > > David Hendricks wrote: >> it will be easier to refactor portions of the code with the large >> patches merged in a buildable and (hopefully) usable/testable state. > > That's pretty weak sauce and I think you all know deep down.
Let's not lose the scope here, please. AFAICT, we are still talking about particular mainboard ports that share, beside boilerplate, maybe 50~70 lines of code. From my point of view, we have much much bigger problems elsewhere. > Who pays for refactoring? Probably someone else. > > That's unsustainable for the project. If we'd make what is said about this case a general rule, maybe yes. But I don't see that David would have implied this. Nico _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
