Pádraig Brady wrote: > > Is the 'fnmatch' module approach, with a .h file that gets included twice, > > acceptable > > to you? That is, would it be OK to have a coreutils program be implemented > > through > > a .c file and a .h file for the core loop? Or do you insist on the code > > being contained > > in a single .c file? > > The fnmatch approach looks very maintainable to me.
This is excellent news! I think I'll propose patches, taking into account your writeup from 2015. Bruno
