Bruno Haible via GNU coreutils General Discussion <[email protected]> writes:
> Pádraig Brady wrote: >> > Is the 'fnmatch' module approach, with a .h file that gets included twice, >> > acceptable >> > to you? That is, would it be OK to have a coreutils program be implemented >> > through >> > a .c file and a .h file for the core loop? Or do you insist on the code >> > being contained >> > in a single .c file? >> >> The fnmatch approach looks very maintainable to me. > > This is excellent news! > > I think I'll propose patches, taking into account your writeup from 2015. Sounds like a good plan to me. Happy to help out with code or patch review. My opinion is that Pádraig's time estimations are a bit optimistic. But that could be because they assumed working on them for a full workday. And I cannot do that. That or he gets work done faster than me. :) Collin
