Collin Funk <[email protected]> writes: > Any thoughts on moving Coreutils to codeberg, which GNU Guix and GNU > Health have already done and Inetutils was considering? > > I have fully given up on the main gnu.org servers. The mirrors worked > quite well, but today I ran into: > > $ git pull > fatal: unable to access > 'https://https.git.savannah.gnu.org/git/gnulib.git/': The requested URL > returned error: 502 > > I reported this [1], but I have no clue who runs the mirrors and that > list does not get actively monitored it seems. So who knows when it will > come back online. > > Collin > > [1] > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-hackers-public/2025-09/msg00018.html
IMO this is a good idea. New contributors would likely find the workflow easier (even though I personally like a mail-based workflow a lot), we can incorporate automated testing, and Codeberg appears to be ideologically aligned with the GNU project goals. Note that we're considering using Sourceware-hosted Forgejo (which Codeberg maintains and uses) for the GNU toolchain, with the advantages above (especially automation-related advantages) in mind. See https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/ForgeExperiment -- Arsen Arsenović
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
