Dragan Simic <[email protected]> writes: > Hello all, > > On 2025-09-28 11:31, Arsen Arsenović wrote: >> IMO this is a good idea. New contributors would likely find the >> workflow easier (even though I personally like a mail-based workflow a >> lot), we can incorporate automated testing, and Codeberg appears to be >> ideologically aligned with the GNU project goals. > > Would sending patches through a mailing list disappear as an option > after the migration to Codebeerg? I'd find that a huge step back.
There might be no need for that for coreutils (which is relatively simple to test - consistent and automated testing is the core benefit of forges IMO). That said, it'd be good to address whatever concerns you might have with such a switch to see if it is possible to build up improvements in workflow. -- Arsen Arsenović
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
