On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote: > Thus ECDH-ES should NEVER have any of the sender static fields and only have > the ephemeral key field. Likewise, ECDH-SS should ONLY have one of the > sender static fields and never have the ephemeral key field.
Got it, thanks. So should the "algorithm" cell in row two of table 19 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cose-msg-14#section-12.4.1) read "ECDH-SS"? (Seeing as the sender's static key would only make sense in ECDH-SS, as I now understand it?) Cheers AGL _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
