Yes it should. Jim
> -----Original Message----- > From: COSE [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Langley > Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2016 5:23 PM > To: Jim Schaad <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [COSE] Binding of sender's key in ECDH-ES. > > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thus ECDH-ES should NEVER have any of the sender static fields and > > only have the ephemeral key field. Likewise, ECDH-SS should ONLY have > > one of the sender static fields and never have the ephemeral key field. > > Got it, thanks. > > So should the "algorithm" cell in row two of table 19 > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cose-msg-14#section-12.4.1) > read "ECDH-SS"? (Seeing as the sender's static key would only make sense in > ECDH-SS, as I now understand it?) > > > Cheers > > AGL > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
