On Oct 7, 2025, at 09:39, Thomas Fossati <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If you are talking about Section 9 of RFC 9052, please read again: > > No, they are referring to the definition of COSE_X509 in §2 of RFC9360.
OK. There is no restriction of the encoding implied there, so this is not ambiguous. (Citing Section 9 of RFC 9052 in the thread sounds like someone tries to apply the restrictions on the signing input procedure to the data in flight here, which is not how COSE works.) Where is the ambiguity? Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
