On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 at 23:24, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thomas Fossati <[email protected]> wrote: > > In short, see Harald's reply [2] for the details, in order to extend > > the acceptable "usage" values, we'd need "[...] to get IESG approval > > on the change. Whether you need to publish an update to RFC 9360 or > > an additional RFC is probably going to be decided by the WG, your AD, > > and the IESG." > > > So, given the ambiguity surrounding the encoding of COSE_X509 raised > > by John and MCR, we may wish to bundle these two together in a brief > > update to RFC 9360. WDYT? > > It seems like draft-ietf-rats-msg-wrap could do this, however, it's left the > WG to > the IESG and IETF LC. But, not on a telechat agenda yet.
No, this requires further discussion with the stakeholders (TCG, Arm, Caliptra, etc.) I'd rather not share fate with CMW. _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
