Hi Russ, Thank you for the suggestion. I hope this PR https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/pull/344 reflects your idea.
Lijun > On 7. Apr 2026, at 21:53, Russ Housley <[email protected]> wrote: > > There is a registry for RDN attributes. It was created ny RFC 9925, and the > ASN.1 module in RFC 9925 can be used as a template for the assignment of the > naming attribute defined here. > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.25 > > Can we change id-at-c509Name to id-rdna-c509Name and assign it in this > registry? > > Russ > > >> On Mar 2, 2026, at 5:07 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-17.txt is now available. It >> is a work item of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) WG of the >> IETF. >> >> Title: CBOR Encoded X.509 Certificates (C509 Certificates) >> Authors: John Preuß Mattsson >> Göran Selander >> Shahid Raza >> Joel Höglund >> Martin Furuhed >> Name: draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-17.txt >> Pages: 88 >> Dates: 2026-03-02 >> >> Abstract: >> >> This document specifies a CBOR encoding of X.509 certificates. The >> resulting certificates are called C509 certificates. The CBOR >> encoding supports a large subset of RFC 5280, common certificate >> profiles and is extensible. >> >> Two types of C509 certificates are defined. One type is an >> invertible CBOR re-encoding of DER-encoded X.509 certificates with >> the signature field copied from the DER encoding. The other type is >> identical except that the signature is over the CBOR encoding instead >> of the DER encoding, avoiding the use of ASN.1. Both types of >> certificates have the same semantics as X.509 and the same reduced >> size compared to X.509. >> >> The document also specifies CBOR encoded data structures for >> certificate (signing) requests and certificate request templates, new >> COSE headers, as well as a TLS certificate type and a file format for >> C509. This document updates RFC 6698; the TLSA selectors registry is >> extended to include C509 certificates. >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert/ >> >> There is also an HTML version available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-17.html >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-17 >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: >> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> COSE mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
