Yes, thanks. > On Apr 11, 2026, at 7:45 AM, Lijun Liao <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Russ, > > Thank you for the suggestion. I hope this PR > https://github.com/cose-wg/CBOR-certificates/pull/344 reflects your idea. > > Lijun > > >> On 7. Apr 2026, at 21:53, Russ Housley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> There is a registry for RDN attributes. It was created ny RFC 9925, and the >> ASN.1 module in RFC 9925 can be used as a template for the assignment of the >> naming attribute defined here. >> >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.25 >> >> Can we change id-at-c509Name to id-rdna-c509Name and assign it in this >> registry? >> >> Russ >> >> >>> On Mar 2, 2026, at 5:07 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-17.txt is now available. It >>> is a work item of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) WG of the >>> IETF. >>> >>> Title: CBOR Encoded X.509 Certificates (C509 Certificates) >>> Authors: John Preuß Mattsson >>> Göran Selander >>> Shahid Raza >>> Joel Höglund >>> Martin Furuhed >>> Name: draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-17.txt >>> Pages: 88 >>> Dates: 2026-03-02 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> >>> This document specifies a CBOR encoding of X.509 certificates. The >>> resulting certificates are called C509 certificates. The CBOR >>> encoding supports a large subset of RFC 5280, common certificate >>> profiles and is extensible. >>> >>> Two types of C509 certificates are defined. One type is an >>> invertible CBOR re-encoding of DER-encoded X.509 certificates with >>> the signature field copied from the DER encoding. The other type is >>> identical except that the signature is over the CBOR encoding instead >>> of the DER encoding, avoiding the use of ASN.1. Both types of >>> certificates have the same semantics as X.509 and the same reduced >>> size compared to X.509. >>> >>> The document also specifies CBOR encoded data structures for >>> certificate (signing) requests and certificate request templates, new >>> COSE headers, as well as a TLS certificate type and a file format for >>> C509. This document updates RFC 6698; the TLSA selectors registry is >>> extended to include C509 certificates. >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert/ >>> >>> There is also an HTML version available at: >>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-17.html >>> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-cose-cbor-encoded-cert-17 >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: >>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> COSE mailing list -- [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> COSE mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
