----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
advice in this forum.]----

Big brother, may try to use this time ,to take our right to air space .in
the name of ????? Wonder how much fuel was save over the last 3 days
??What
if we dont get to fly any more at all----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Bullough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:30 PM
Subject: [COUPERS] Better stand up now!


> ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following
any
advice in this forum.]----
>
> Your EAA ( www.eaa.org ) and AOPA ( www.aopa.org) are both on board with
some
> rather strong statements regarding DOT Secratary Mineta's reneging on
his
> agreements
> with them regarding GA access to the airspace.
>
> In case you don't know, the FAA first announced that we would be able to
> fly at 11AM EDT
> today. At 9:58AM the AOPA announced they were hedging. Art 10:50AM, they
> announced
> that the major airlines can fly but GA can't.
>
> I have faxed/sent the following to my congressional delegation:
> I am writing you to express my strong objection to Secretary of
> Transportation Norm Mineta's ongoing ban of General Aviation activity in
US
> Airspace. Commercial air traffic is being permitted, and General
Aviation
> activity was supposed to have been re-activated at the same time and on
the
> same terms. However, literally ten minutes before light aircraft were
given
> permission to fly, the DOT issued new restrictions against GA. This
> includes personal, business, and air charter operations in the lower 48
and
> Hawaii.
>
> General Aviation has not been demonstrated to pose significant security
> risk in the current circumstances. Indeed, it could be argued that
> commercial air-carrier aviation, with the present half-measures taken to
> improve security, is a far greater risk. When explosive-laden rental
trucks
> were used at the prior WTC incident and in Oklahoma City, did the DOT
ban
> sedans from the nations highways? It did not. Neither should an incident
> with a hijacked airliner preclude use of light aircraft.
>
> The current ban damages many businesses here in New Jersey. Small
airports
> and aviation-support businesses, as well as flight instructors and
charter
> pilots continue to suffer. These are not businesses or professionals who
> can continue in business in the face of such losses. In the event of a
> national defense need they will, however, provide a valuable training
> resource. If the DOT allows them to stay in business.
>
> Together with the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association and the
> Experimental Aircraft Association, I urge you to contact Mr. Mineta and
> President Bush in order to restore unrestricted access to US airspace to
> personal and business use of General Aviation aircraft.
>
> I would suggest that everyone take the time to stand up for their right
to
> use the
> airspace over their own country on an equal footing with big commercial
> interests,
> before the current sad situation is used as an excuse to take away that
right
> for good.
>
> The longer they get to think about it, the longer they'll have to make
up
> fanciful
> James Bond scenarios, and the less likely it is that we'll continue to
be
> free to
> move about the skies... ...ever.
>
> Greg
>
>
>

==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aVxiLm.aVzvvT
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to