Glen, I see some of where you got excited. I do indeed see the line you quote: "... develop a type specific certification program for A&P mechanics who would like to work on the aircraft type."
Let's amend the proposal to be: "... develop a type specific certification program for A&P mechanics who would like to **inspect and sign-off** work on the aircraft type." (I didn't include the asterisks in the revision of the master copy.) Thanks for finding that mis-wording, Glen. Do you see anything else that doesn't match the intent as I've been explaining it here? Ed g w wrote: > > You wrote:>type rated A&P (TR A&P) > certifications should be developed to improve the ongoing maintenance and< > PURE CRAP! Ed you folks are really getting silly. Why don't you forget > about this before you make an even bigger mess? Maybe they are a somewhat > rare type but not by airplane standards and they are no different than any > other aluminum plane. Save the rare classification for Curtiss Jennys. > You wrote: > >develop a type specific > certification program for A&P mechanics who would like to work on the > aircraft< > This is STUPID! Just how hard do you think it is to work on a Ercoupe? > Really, I think you people are getting a little too self-important! I hope > your proposal never goes anywhere. If they can't just give owner > maintenance like they did in Canada then I sure don't want any Ercoupe mob > deciding who can and can't work on it! > Glen Ward > __________________________________________________________________________ ______ To unsubscribe from this list please send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___________________________________________________________ T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
