I understand what you are saying about the wider prop wash, but I can't understand why it would be wider. Also, I can't understand why the 48" pitch prop would put out faster moving air than the 50" pitch prop.
Syd Claude Wheelbarger wrote: > Hi Syd > I should have said the wider width of the propwash as it spreads out behind > the prop. Imagine an adjustable beam maglite when your standing in front of > the plane. The 7150 would have had been just wide wnough to encompass the > tail. The 7148 however would have been a much wider rearward beam going well > wider than the tail. Wide enough in my case to include the inner 1/2 of each > wing and the gear. Then imagine the lighted part of the plane being in > increased drag relevant to the higher speed air. I'm terrible at explaining > things exactly as I think them most times. > > Claude
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
