I guess I really fouled up on this one.  It fooled me as it probably was
intended to do.  What a cruel trick!
I am reasonably sure that the 82UL has been approved as it was in a
previous Avflash and I have spoken to two different FBOs to ascertain when
and if we can expect the fuel locally.

Apparently this was a dirty trick by someone and I fell for it.  Please
forgive me and I promise never to send anything to coupers digest again,
I'll just follow along and listen to you folks.

Sorry,
Denny
N93990
Shawnee, KS










At 08:33 AM 4/1/99 -0600, you wrote:
>       Hey Coupers,
>Have you read this?  Pretty Kool, huh?
>This is an exerpt from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>I hope this is of interest to everyone.  It appears to me that we are
>finally going to be able to select proper fuel for our birds.
>       Denny
>       N93990  
>       Shawnee, KS
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Getting Fuelish: FAA Follows Approval Of 82UL With 100LW... 
>Aviation fuel may finally get the lead out, thanks to the second
>significant technological advance in a year: a 100LL avgas replacement.
>Earlier this year, an 80-octane avgas replacement -- dubbed 82UL, or
>ultra-low lead -- was announced by the FAA and the petroleum industry.
>However, that fuel is designed only for low-compression engines, with
>comparatively low power for their displacement. Now, thanks to continuing
>research into the technology behind 82UL, those who fly with larger, more
>powerful engines will be able to take advantage of new fuels, also.
Dubbed
>100LW -- or 100-octane lightweight -- the immediate advantage to pilots
of
>this new fuel over 100LL will be obvious: a substantial increase in
payload
>without changes to the airframe or the engine. Other advantages include
>more power at the same fuel flow or less fuel flow for the same power,
>reduced unburned hydrocarbon emissions and cleaner injector nozzles or
>carburetor jets. 
>

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to