Eduardo Kienetz writes:
On 7/11/07, Sam Varshavchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Eduardo Kienetz writes:> hmm, this made me think about courier-imap... and my graduation project... > Sam, do you think some courier-imap operations could be parallelised > (via MPI on a cluster) to improve performance? There's nothing much to parallelize. The only operations worth parallelizing are SEARCH and SORT. However, nobody really uses SORT, except some very simple clients. Most IMAP clients cache all message metadata, and do sorting themselves. And I don't know how much you can buy in savings from doing any kind of parallelization of SEARCH. It's doubtfull whether the overhead and complexity of setting up a parallelization framework will buy you much. The overhead still consists of reading message files, which is an I/O bound process where parallelization isn't going to help much.Oh noes, gonna have to find something else to parallelize for my graduation project :P BTW, don't you happen to have something/idea?
Yes, but it does not involve parallelization.
pgpxbK2qhm88k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Courier-imap mailing list Courier-imap@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-imap
