On Fri, 31 May 2002, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>Andreas Aardal Hanssen writes:
>> 5 fetch 1500:1400 flags
>> 5 OK FETCH completed.
>> This is wrong. 1500:1400 is the same as 1400:1500, and as the listing
>No it's not.
Did you follow this discussion on the imap protocol mailing list?
This is from the RFC:
sequence_num ::= nz_number / "*"
;; * is the largest number in use. For message
;; sequence numbers, it is the number of messages
;; in the mailbox. For unique identifiers, it is
;; the unique identifier of the last message in
;; the mailbox.
set ::= sequence_num / (sequence_num ":" sequence_num) /
(set "," set)
;; Identifies a set of messages. For message
;; sequence numbers, these are consecutive
;; numbers from 1 to the number of messages in
;; the mailbox
;; Comma delimits individual numbers, colon
;; delimits between two numbers inclusive.
;; Example: 2,4:7,9,12:* is 2,4,5,6,7,9,12,13,
;; 14,15 for a mailbox with 15 messages.
Where does it say that for a:b, b > a? Please explain your quick
conclusion.
Andy
>> shows, those messages exist.
>>
>> This is also wrong:
>>
>> 6 uid fetch 6000:* flags
>> 6 OK FETCH completed.
>>
>> The IMAP server should respond with
>>
>> * 1513 FETCH (UID 5308 FLAGS (\Seen))
>
>No it shouldn't.
>
>
--
Andreas Aardal Hanssen
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
