When spam inevitably sneaks through, you end up with it twice
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Kennedy Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 2:38 PM To: Courier Users Subject: Re: [courier-users] To MX or not... On 19 1 2005 at 4:18 pm -0500, Jay Lee wrote: > However, more recently, >spammer techniques has caused me to rethink the usefulness of a Backup >MX Server which accepts all mail for delivery, without spam filters or >rcpt checking. The obvious solution is to put spam filtering and rcpt checking on your secondary MX. Why is this not an option? It's what I do. Both of my machines run identical filtering. -ben -- Ben Kennedy, chief magician zygoat creative technical services 613-228-3392 | 1-866-466-4628 http://www.zygoat.ca ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
