>> On 20.08.13 19:13, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>>> BTW, 4408bis just entered Last Call.  There are not many differences,
>>> but it seems to be a good occasion to review SPF implementations.

>On Wed 21/Aug/2013 11:35:17 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> oh, hell. again that "people have not started using SPF, let's forbid it".
>> same like "people don't go forward, let's go back then"

On 23.08.13 14:13, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>The spec was buggy on what type servers should look up, and querying
>both --which is what Courier does-- is a waste of resources.  Skipping
>an unnecessary query seems to be rather an acknowledgment that type 99
>never flew, than a step backward.

If it worked this way, We would not have MX records because the transition
would not happen - because of the same reason. much better would be to
better define how should resolver behave...

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
REALITY.SYS corrupted. Press any key to reboot Universe.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
courier-users mailing list
courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

Reply via email to