On Tue 03/Sep/2013 17:41:41 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 23.08.13 14:13, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >>The spec was buggy on what type servers should look up, and querying >>both --which is what Courier does-- is a waste of resources. Skipping >>an unnecessary query seems to be rather an acknowledgment that type 99 >>never flew, than a step backward. > > If it worked this way, We would not have MX records because the transition > would not happen - because of the same reason. much better would be to > better define how should resolver behave...
Defining resolver behavior and having them comply are not the same thing. If they were, we'd need no TXT record for SPF or DKIM, and could use binary formats and edns0... See also http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-klensin-iana-txt-rr-registry -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
