––––––––––––––
Geoff DiMasi
P'unk Avenue
215 755 1330
punkave.com


On Oct 22, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Gregory Heller wrote:

> I'd like to take the opportunity to point out the difference between
> Open Source, and Free Software.
>
> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/free-software-for-freedom.html
> " The fundamental difference between the two movements is in their
> values, their ways of looking at the world. For the Open Source
> movement, the issue of whether software should be open source is a
>
> practical question, not an ethical one. As one person put it, "Open
> source is a development methodology; free software is a social
> movement." For the Open Source movement, non-free software is a
> suboptimal solution. For the Free Software movement, non-free software
>
> is a social problem and free software is the solution."

I think we are more Open Source. It is a practical question in many  
ways.











>
> I think that Co-working in more aligned with the concept of Free
> Software, than simply open source.  (as i was typing this, i  
> thought of
> the analogy coworking is to day offices and shared office suites what
>
> free software is to open source).
>
> While the co-working concept may be an "open source" concept in  
> that it
> is freely traded and improved upon by others, (and you could not  
> really
> call something like coworking "free software" people would just  
> look at
>
> you funny), when we start talking about software, I think it  
> behooves us
> to use the more accurate terminology.
>
> I am not trying to start any deep philosophical (or worse, religious!)
> discussion here about whether or not the CW movement religiously  
> adheres
>
> to the tenets of GNU and the FSF, I just want to make sure that people
> know that there is a difference between Open Source software and Free
> Software, and use the right term for what they are talking about.
>
>
> On 10/22/07, Raimo van der Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to add that we (Tribeminds in the Netherlands) have a
> similar structure planned as Tara.
>
> Below I would like to share our Purpose Statement:
> To support independents and entrepeneurs in...
>         1. Finding shared minds
>         2. Finding great projects
>         3. Finding a great place to work
> ...by facilitating a network and connecting all stakeholders in a
> green way
>
> You see we need to connect the people around 3 objects: the place, the
> project and the network(people)
>
> More information on our project will be shared coming weeks. Have a
> peek preview at www.tribeminds.nl (we still need to change alot on
> this site haha)
>
> Talk soon!
>
>
>
> On Oct 21, 6:45 pm, "Jacob Sayles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Where did this go?  Eva, did you open source your ruby app?
> > Jacob Sayles
> > Office Nomads
> > Seattle, WA
> >
> > On 4/30/07, Tara Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hey Alex,
> >
> > > I think you were just appointed the person to help guide this. ;)
> >
> > > T
> >
> > > On 4/30/07, Alex Hillman < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > > > If you're going Open Source (everyone), consider
> > > >https://www.bountysource.com/instead of SourceForge.
> >
> > > > Same functions as sourceforge as far as project wiki,  
> documentation,
> > > > task management, and source control...plus it's built on  
> rails....plus plus
> > > > there's a whole open source economy around task-driven  
> development. You can
> > > > monetize feature requests, enticing developers to contribute  
> to your
> > > > project.
> >
> > > > The site is run by a couple of friends of mine, it's a  
> trustworthy site
> > > > and a good way to support the economy in Opensville.
> >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Alex
> >
> > > > On 4/30/07, Tara Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > >  This is all amazing.
> >
> > > > > Chris and I visited Eva and David at CubeSpace in Portland  
> last week,
> > > > > which was awesome. Great people and a very well-run, nice  
> space. In order to
> > > > > run something of their scale (what was it? 13,000 ft2?),  
> they have to have
> > > > > some seriously kickass software in place. :) I'm really  
> pumped about getting
> > > > > it out there.
> >
> > > > > And Rich...this sounds great.
> >
> > >
> > > If you guys need any licensing help, just ask. I'm sure there are
> > > > > quite a few Open Source experts on the list! :)
> >
> > > > > Perhaps we should carve out a space at SourceForge? I don't  
> really
> > > > > know how it works, but...
> >
> > > > > T
> >
> > > > > On 4/30/07, Rich Vázquez < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > One other consideration for organizing folks that some  
> may take for
> > > > > > granted - in our Time Bank project we'll be releasing, we  
> are also opening
> > > > > > up the documentation (policies and manuals)  to Creative  
> Commons or similar
> > > > > > licenses are start-ups to have access to some of the  
> structure, ideas
> > > > > > address and forms, etc.
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > Rich Vázquez, CISSP
> > > > > >www.opensourcecurrency.org
> >
> > > > > > On 4/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > CubeSpace is a co-working site in Portland, Oregon and  
> we have a
> > > > > > > proprietary database built in Ruby on Rails.  We are  
> meeting with
> > > > > > > out
> > > > > > > developer on Wednesday to make sure there are no CubeSpace
> > > > > > > security
> > > > > > > issues in sharing what we have, but assuming he gives us a
> > > > > > > thumbs-up,
> > > > > > > we will be happy to share it with this group.
> >
> > > > > > > We designed it to track reservation and usages, as well  
> as to
> > > > > > > serve as
> > > > > > > our point-of-sale interface.  I will warn you it is  
> buggy and
> > > > > > > temperamental and clearly needs more work, but the  
> relational
> > > > > > > database
> > > > > > > structure is sound.  We are eager to see what you all  
> can do with
> > > > > > > it!
> >
> > > > > > > -Eva
> > > > > > > Eva Sari Schweber
> > > > > > > Chief Cat Herder
> > > > > > > CubeSpace, Your WorkSpace Community
> > > > > > > 622 SE Grand Avenue
> > > > > > > Portland, OR 97214
> > > > > > > (503) 206-3299 Voice
> > > > > > > (503) 206-3302 Fax
> > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email
> > > > > > >www.CubeSpacePDX.com
> >
> > > > > > > On Mar 26, 10:19 am, "Samuel Rose" <  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Louis, I also plugged in a tool under "New Tool  
> proposal" that
> > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > coworkers may be interested in: an open source  
> application to
> > > > > > > handle
> > > > > > > > money pooling, revenue sharing, expensetracking, and  
> revenue
> > > > > > > sharetracking. Feel free to remove of course if this is  
> out of place, but I
> > > > > > > > thought coworkers might find the functions of such an
> > > > > > > application
> > > > > > > > useful.
> >
> > > > > > > > On Mar 25, 9:20 pm, "Louis Montagne" <  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Tara,
> > > > > > > > > to follow up on the discussions we had in Austin,  
> I've created
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > pagehttps://coworking.pbwiki.com/CoworkingTools. We  
> are
> > > > > > > starting to
> > > > > > > > > work on the core social networking features. (with  
> the help of
> > > > > > > a micro
> > > > > > > > > barcamp). Perhaps we can draft a few things with  
> Alex & Jacob
> > > > > > > ?
> >
> > > > > > > > > Best,
> >
> > > > > > > > > Louis.
> >
> > > > > > > > > On 3/23/07, Tara Hunt < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi John,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Chris and I and our project team have actually  
> seen your
> > > > > > > spec. It's pretty
> > > > > > > > > > cool, but totally doesn't do what we are trying to
> > > > > > > accomplish with ours. We
> > > > > > > > > > spoke to Noel about this. Basically, you are  
> approaching
> > > > > > > your web site from
> > > > > > > > > > a facility management angle and we are  
> approaching ours from
> > > > > > > a coworking
> > > > > > > > > > network of spaces angle. Yours = functional (and  
> really
> > > > > > > functional for your
> > > > > > > > > > space in particular...I don't know how many  
> spaces are
> > > > > > > commoditizing the
> > > > > > > > > > desks to the level of fine detail that you are)  
> and Ours =
> > > > > > > promotional &
> > > > > > > > > > social.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Our roadmap looks like:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Phase 1 - network the spaces themselves (and give  
> oodles of
> > > > > > > > > > information/support on setting spaces up)
> > > > > > > > > > Phase 2 - network the coworkers (to be able to  
> create ad hoc
> > > > > > > project teams
> > > > > > > > > > like:http://www.programmermeetdesign<http:// 
> www.programmermeetdesigner.comdoesbut >
> > > > > > > er.comdoesbut <http:// 
> www.programmermeetdesigner.comdoesbut> with
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > coworking kudos/reputation system built in)
> > > > > > > > > > Phase 3 - more space management tools as per the  
> demands of
> > > > > > > the network (so,
> > > > > > > > > > as we watch these spaces emerge and issues come  
> up, we can
> > > > > > > generalize them
> > > > > > > > > > into a tool and open up an API, perhaps, to make it
> > > > > > > extensible and
> > > > > > > > > > personalize it)
> > > > > > > > > > Phase 4 - getting into more services...probably  
> less about
> > > > > > > the web site
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Sort of growing with the movement and creating  
> the tools to
> > > > > > > help everyone
> > > > > > > > > > along.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > I think, though, down the road, we should  
> definitely work on
> > > > > > > how these fit
> > > > > > > > > > together. It would be very helpful for all involved.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Tara
> >
> > > > > > > > > > On 3/23/07, 116westhouston < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > not sure anyone is aware - i have been writing a
> > > > > > > functional spec for a
> > > > > > > > > > > 'co-working facility management' web site, i  
> have sent a
> > > > > > > few versions
> > > > > > > > > > > to noel hidalgo and will publish this to the group
> > > > > > > soon...my space is
> > > > > > > > > > >http://116westhouston.com
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > john
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 8:31 am, "Nate W" <  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Here in New York we have the "Freelancer's  
> Union" which
> > > > > > > essentially
> > > > > > > > > > > > works to get health care for those who would be
> > > > > > > coworking (as long as
> > > > > > > > > > > > you're billing about 20 hours a week).
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Partnering with an organization like this --  
> one which
> > > > > > > exists to
> > > > > > > > > > > > navigate the healthcare industry for  
> freelancers and
> > > > > > > single-person
> > > > > > > > > > > > shops -- may be the best bet, as "unionizing  
> and getting
> > > > > > > health care"
> > > > > > > > > > > > is a lot easier said than done.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Also, supporting something like the  
> Freelancer's Union
> > > > > > > helps extend
> > > > > > > > > > > > the movement beyond the walls of coworking  
> spaces :-)
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Nate Westheimer
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 21, 10:33 pm, "Tara Hunt"  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yep. Agreed. These would be 'add on'  
> services for
> > > > > > > those coworkers and
> > > > > > > > > > spaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > in need.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > T
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> We will also be looking into the  
> administration
> > > > > > > of really crucial
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > things like: - affordable healthcare  -  
> green
> > > > > > > certification for the
> > > > > > > > > > spaces
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You mean as part of thesoftware?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Being from Montréal (we haven't opened  
> yet) and
> > > > > > > knowing Paris is a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > very promising one, just to give two  
> examples, I'd
> > > > > > > suggest keeping
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > things like healthcare if not completely  
> separate at
> > > > > > > least options
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > easy to "turn off", it doesn't work the  
> same around
> > > > > > > the world and in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > some places we actually don't need it ;)
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Same thing for Green business and  
> probably most
> > > > > > > programs, rules and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > regulations vary country to country.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patrick
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Tara
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -----------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > > > tara 'miss rogue' hunt
> > > > > > > > > > > > > agent provocateur
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Citizen Agency (www.citizenagency.com)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > blog: www.horsepigcow.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > phone: 415-694-1951
> > > > > > > > > > > > > fax: 415-727-5335
> >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> >
> > ...
> >
> > read more »
>
>
>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Coworking" group.
To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to