A little late to the discussion but I am happy to share the coworking component of our contract and I do have connections to legal resources should we need. Cubes & Crayons agreement was created by a lawyer and protects us from liability and protects our clients. We don't have a defamation clause.
All the best, Felicity Space: www.cubesandcrayons.com Blog: cubes.typepad.com/blog Personal blog: cubes.typepad.com/cake On Sep 26, 9:15 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd be interested in helping review/edit/publish. Do we have any leads on > legal resources available? Does a creative commons license or gnu fdl > license make sense for everyone? > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile > > -----Original Message----- > From: marc1919 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:03:50 > To: Coworking<coworking@googlegroups.com> > Subject: [Coworking] Re: New Work City membership agreement - version 1 > > I'd be very interested in helping to create an open source universal > coworking agreement. > > Marc Nathanwww.houstontech.org|www.katydock.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Sep 26, 10:01 am, "Alex Hillman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > To the many of you who've worked from our agreement: > > Ours was taken from a very generic "shared space" agreement that I found > > somewhere on the web. We needed something FAST, so we slightly modded the > > TOS that I'd found and worked from there. > > > It's been my desire for over a year now to tone down that agreement, it's > > got a lot of garbage and legalese in it. > > > If anyone is interested in working with Geoff and myself, as well as if > > anyone has any legal resources that could chip in, I'd love to work together > > to create an open source coworking agreement that covers what really needs > > to be covered, and cuts out all of the other crap. > > > -Alex > > > -- > > ----- > > -- > > ----- > > Alex Hillman > > im always developing something > > digital: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > visual:www.dangerouslyawesome.com > > local:www.indyhall.org > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Tony Bacigalupo > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > Agreed all around. So should we simply removed the "disparaging" or get > > > rid > > > of the clause altogether? Is it important to have protection against > > > defamation? > > > > Also, since the space isn't open yet, we'll be adding stipulations that > > > membership won't start until after the space is open, and that the space > > > will open within a certain range of dates or the agreement is null and > > > void. > > > > Anything else? > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > statements or comments of a defamatory or disparaging nature to any > > >> > third party regarding NEW > > > >> Yeah, we based our contract on IH too (thanks Alex!) but took out > > >> "disparaging" after the first round of signings, "defamation" is one > > >> thing but with "disparaging" in there it looks like we don't want to > > >> be critiqued either. > > > >> Btw, if anyone opens up a space in Canada, our version has a couple of > > >> local tweaks so feel free to ask for the file. > > > >> Patrick > > >> station-c.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Coworking" group. To post to this group, send email to coworking@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/coworking?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
