On 10/6/07, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It wouldn't be the first time a module had had OS-specific features. In > this case, "if you're on Unix you can ...".
CPAN::Reporter already uses Win32::Process when it needs to honor CPAN interactivity_timeout requests. (Which I do plan to extend to test timeouts, too.) > to detect warnings*, but I suggest that anything sent to STDERR (which > includes warnings) is Bad and should result in a WARNING email, because No, no, no, no! (a) to keep diagnostic output with tests in as close to the failing test, we want to merge STDOUT and STDERR for reports (b) plenty of modules test warnings by sending stuff to STDERR. (Probably shouldn't but they do.) David