On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 11:42:07AM -0500, David Golden wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Barbie <bar...@missbarbell.co.uk> wrote: > > It might be worth using a different email address for each VM. Currently > > I have 'apo...@cpan.org' blacklisted. I'll lift that ban now that you've > > stopped the smokers and can investigate the problem. However, if it > > happens again, being able to blacklist based on an email address (or a > > Metabase userid in the future), means we can reduce the impact of a > > specific runaway smoker, rather than them all. > > That's an interesting point. What would be some good ways to uniquely > identify particular smokers in the future?
If the tester has a unique guid, then the additional platform/perl values may provide additional uniqueness to provide a smoker guid. Cheers, Barbie. -- Birmingham Perl Mongers <http://birmingham.pm.org> Memoirs Of A Roadie <http://barbie.missbarbell.co.uk> CPAN Testers Blog <http://blog.cpantesters.org> YAPC Conference Surveys <http://yapc-surveys.org>
