On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 02:08:25PM +0100, Vincent Pit wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 07:33:55AM -0500, David Golden wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Barbie <bar...@missbarbell.co.uk> > >> wrote: > >> > I'd rather block at my end, as it will lay the groundwork for similar > >> > protection in the future. I'll then look at "deleting" his reports > >> from > >> > the past few weeks. > >> > >> I'd prefer a solution which "invalidates" reports rather than > > > > This is what really happens. Hence why I said "read hide" in the first > > paragraph :) > > > > But as long as reports reach nntp, they will still appear in Slaven's > matrix, which is quite widely used. I also believe that they will be > fetched by CPANPLUS's "check from cpantesters" feature.
Slaven and CPANPLUS read from my files. If a report gets hidden, the appropriate files will get regenerated, thus hiding the report from the rest of the eco-system :) Cheers, Barbie. -- Birmingham Perl Mongers <http://birmingham.pm.org> Memoirs Of A Roadie <http://barbie.missbarbell.co.uk> CPAN Testers Blog <http://blog.cpantesters.org> YAPC Conference Surveys <http://yapc-surveys.org>
