On Nov 20, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Barbie <bar...@missbarbell.co.uk> wrote:
> I suspect this is a fault with the reader, as this hasn't been changed in > years. The RSS feeds are built from the full list as that was how some were > originally reading them, as opposed to the .json files. Yeah, my guess is that they’re trying to save storage space by discarding older items. > I could perhaps reduce them to the last year or last 6 months, or an > arbitrary number. > > A question for all those who use the RSS feeds, how many entries would you > want to see? Six or 12 months would be fine with me. I don’t think an arbitrary number makes as much sense, as the distance back in time will be in the feed will be vastly different for folks like rjbs or Miyagawa than they would be for folks like cstoss. IOW, I think depth of time is more important. Best, David
