> Anyway, Sub::Name passed all the tests. Awesome, thank you!
> I'll keep the smoker shutdown... when you release an official Sub::Name new version, I'll try again from the cpan shell. If it is all good, I'll turn on the smoker again, although I'm thinking about implementing something to send only the PASSed reports, which would give a change to review those that failed. All that sounds fine, except you can turn on the smoker now... It would be nice to see some test coverage using the trial release before it goes stable. > Is it possible to provide a list of the (tested) distro directory content to the report? That would help making sure the test failed with a core dump I don't know if it's possible to run an arbitrary command after smoking a module -- anyone? On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior via cpan-testers-discuss <cpan-testers-discuss@perl.org> wrote: > Em 09-09-2016 13:04, Karen Etheridge escreveu: > >> Alceu, would it be possible for you to test the patch in >> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=117072 ? (You don't have to >> do anything with git; just applying the patch to the latest CPAN release >> should work fine, and then perl Makefile.PL && make test && make install). >> >> (I wonder if this is the sources of all the segfaults I've been seeing >> from BinGOs's FreeBSD smokers as well...) >> >> If this looks good, I'll release it as -TRIAL. thanks so much! >> >> > Looks like I got into this a little bit late, I saw that you're already > release Sub::Name as trial, so I grabbed it from CPAN. > > I was able to install it but not from the CPAN shell, I did it directly > from bash. Keep in mind that the previous release I was able to install all > from bash, but not from the CPAN shell. > > Anyway, Sub::Name passed all the tests. I went through all the reports > from me that you requested a review and I was able to install all of them > (I sent some, but not all, reports, for those not yet tested). > > I'll keep the smoker shutdown... when you release an official Sub::Name > new version, I'll try again from the cpan shell. If it is all good, I'll > turn on the smoker again, although I'm thinking about implementing > something to send only the PASSed reports, which would give a change to > review those that failed. > > Is it possible to provide a list of the (tested) distro directory content > to the report? That would help making sure the test failed with a core dump. >
