Whoosh, sounds there is a lot of interest in this discussion ! In my opinion, we shouldn't try to embrace everything neither to be too specific... Think about the projects and people at LGM this year, and try to reflect that : we aren't hostile to musicians, but that's not the domain where we are fluent. On the other side, we aren't only artists nor designers.
It's aim to be a cross project for "libre" drawings, 3D, webdesign, print, automating tools like Phatch, typography, scripting, etc... it will join different peoples (developers, designers and artists, and also teachers) in a common interest. The name mustn't exclude part of it, neither try to embrace the whole world ... maybe we can think to something more similar to "reclaim your tools" like the "free brush foundation" (Ok, it's stupid, but you get the idea). Hard exercise, but let's keep going the brain storming ! 2010/5/31 Thorsten Wilms <t...@freenet.de> > On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 14:36 +0200, John Haltiwanger wrote: > > > Graphics doesn't include type.. And artists includes everyone.. So > > where do we find the best fit? > > I see no reason to exclude type from graphics and for all I know it is > not commonly done. In other words: graphics does include type, graphic > design does include typography, although a specialist in either might be > vary to call himself a specialist in both. > > > -- > Thorsten Wilms > > thorwil's design for free software: > http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > CREATE mailing list > CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create >
_______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create