Dave Neary wrote:
Smiley indicates humour or irony... but I'll answer this straight :)

in my case, i tried to express through a smiley the fact that the question was meant in a positive, friendly way and not in a provocative way. i guess the one of yours was a more ironic one.

does anybody care?

* Whatever the name is:
** Ask the Software Freedom Conservancy (affiliated with the SFLC) to be
a fiscal agent and provide basic non-profit services for the group
(address, bank account, ability to accept tax deductible donations in US)
* Move the Create project under the ambit of the Create Foundation or
whatever
* Get benefits of a non-profit without the paperwork and administrative
overhead
* Can be put into motion quickly and works super well

Cleared things up? :)

somehow.

i still don't know what the SFLC is, but i guess it's a US american company which would do a similar work for, us as the gnome foundation is currently doing for the LGM.

what i'm still missing are the advantages against just creating a very simple association and using an external organization (like the gnome foundation) to manage our founds.


or would the SFLC be the full politically correct partner boudwijn was suggesting we shold look for?

some thoughts on top of it:
- at the bof there was some sort of agreement to build an association
instead of a foundation (it was more a preference than a final decision)

To-may-to to-mah-to? What's the difference between an association and a
foundation to you? The GNOME Foundation is an association, its name just
has "foundation" in it.

basically, a foundation is an organization managing founds with a moral goal; an association is just a group of physical or moral persons following a common goal. this is what i recall from the law courses i followed several years ago.

in my country there is some paperwork attached to the creation of foundation, but an association is created by the simple will of the associates to do so (you may formalize it's existence if you want).

i'm not sure if you're allowed to use the name foundation for an association (it may also depend on the country your are referring to...) but i don't think it really matters at the current stage. we are not talking about what kind of words we want to attach to the name but about the legal form we want to give to the organisation.


in our case, the reasons for proposing to create an assocation instead of a foundation was related to how fast we can create an organization and how much work would it be to run it. the idea was to minimize the administrative overhead and outsource the finnances to an existing association or foundation which already is registered to do it (we may even have one in the US for US tax payers and one in the EU for european ones).



ciao
a.l.e


p.s.: after trying several times to understand what "To-may-to to-mah-to?" actually means, i finally got it. now: can we keep a language level which is a bit more friendly to non native speakers? (if requested, i may even personally switch to sentences with correct caps).
_______________________________________________
CREATE mailing list
CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create

Reply via email to