On 17.01.2014 19:07, Susan Spencer wrote: > Hi Christoph, Hi Susan,
> Well, I suppose that a Code of Conduct is meaningless without a plan to > implement it. No need for chaos and confusion and miscommunication to > erupt if an incident occurs. Having a process defined is always the > most efficient way to handle any potential occurrence (this goes for > running a convention as well as running a data center). It's just > logical and practical. It's like having an emergency exit plan posted > for use in the event of fire. It's no good to figure out what to do, > word it properly, and post it once a fire breaks out. we do not need to do this on our own, because plans exist and had a lot of effort put into them, and are explained as well. For example, I'd be very happy if the LGM organizers follow advices like those in http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Women-friendly_events (and the articles linked from there) and implement the suggestions given there. I like the emergency exit plan image Susan used above. You may not need it even just once in your whole life, but if you suddenly do, you will be very glad that it is there and that you even remember some of it without even trying to. In general, I found http://geekfeminism.wikia.com to be an invaluable resource, both to adjust my own behavior and learn about challenges I never thought possible. P.S. I'm part of a community that has an entry in Geekfeminism's Timeline of Incidents; I was partly involved in that incident myself (not perp, but cared too little and even had stayed on not rather good terms with the perp for too long) and I think that it took us rather long to solve this. If we have, I'm not sure if it is up to me to decide. I definitely do not want LGM to appear there ever, and especially not in a way that shows the organizers to have been unprepared. NB: I do not know if they weren't already prepared at previous LGMs, because I didn't have to test this and may never have to; I'm a white male and play life on easy. Addendum: By arranging for the sponsoring of part of LGM, I feel a certain responsibility to make sure that everyone feels good there. Remember the party at Madrid last year? It was pleasing to learn that the location is in a nice neighborhood, that the location itself, the bartenders and the security guard ("sorry, you may not take your beer outside. but just put it inside the doorstep, that'll be ok") were nice, and that each and everyone was happy there. Nevertheless, I scanned the relevant blogs for some time after the event, to make sure that if anything I wasn't aware of popped up, I'd be able to react asap. NB: if something did pop up, I haven't noticed it. After all, I have to (at least, am strongly encouraged to) write reports about the sponsored social events at LGM (and I learned that you rather not try to be funny in those reports, but stick to the facts), because the people who handle our money for us care about reputation and their partial 501(c)(3) status. And I fully agree with their requirement. -- Regards, Michael GPG: 96A8 B38A 728A 577D 724D 60E5 F855 53EC B36D 4CDD _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create