I think the normal way of collecting State of slides for LGM is to have the project provide a few slides at most, and then a speaking script. Boud usually talks through the slides according to the script (or whoever is stepping up to the plate that year to present it - it was boud in Saarbruecken and I thought he did a fantastic job - his voice is like butter).
We can certainly upload what we put together to maybe fill in any gaps or projects that didn't get a chance to submit anything. If anyone gets a moment to maybe drop a few words about their project status in the hackmd that would be awesome, btw! :) We've had a good turnout in the past couple of years for the "Libre Graphics" track at SCaLE and it would be great to provide some project updates to the audience there. On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:36 AM Mica Semrick <m...@silentumbrella.com> wrote: > Hi Ale et al. > > I appreciate that you have your preferred workflow for producing slides > and you should certainly use whatever workflow works for you. > > I try to make the barrier for contributing as low as possible, that's why > it isn't a git repository. Hackmd is nice because one opens it in a web > browser and types. That's it. I'm willing to trade some possible sabotage > for a dead simple way for people to contribute. > > As far as contacting you privately, I don't see why that is necessary. > > If you doubt the performance of hackmd or our particular document, that is > OK and nobody is forcing you to use it or even to open it. However, your > immediate response was to shut down to our method of collecting > information, and I don't appreciate that. > > Best, > Mica > > On February 24, 2020 7:52:37 AM PST, ale rimoldi <ale.comp...@xox.ch> > wrote: >> >> hi nathan >> >> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 8:53 AM ale rimoldi <ale.comp...@xox.ch> >>> wrote: >>> >>> your talk, but, if you want we can join our effort... >>>> >>>> if you want to do so, please get in touch with me per email! >>>> >>>> >>>> It seems like this sort of information is something that is best done >>> by working in public. Sure, there may be the occasional project that >>> wants to save a surprise announcement, but on the whole, >>> deduplication of effort benefits everyone, as does sharing info >>> collectively. >>> >> >> yes. >> >> but they did not get in touch with me, so i will probably continue with >> the traditional (and public) way of doing it for the lgm, as we did in >> the last few years. >> a way that produces a public collection of facts that anybody can use >> for their goals. >> >> as a reference, this is the stuff that was collected in the open for the >> state of libre graphics 2019: >> >> https://github.com/libregraphicsmeeting/state-of-lg-2019/ >> >> ciao >> a.l.e >> ------------------------------ >> CREATE mailing list >> CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create >> >> _______________________________________________ > CREATE mailing list > CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create > -- https://patdavid.net GPG: 66D1 7CA6 8088 4874 946D 18BD 67C7 6219 89E9 57AC
_______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
