Dear George,
On 10/8/2020 5:29 PM, George Bruseker wrote:
Dear Martin,
CRMdig does need a review, and CRMPe would be good to merge with it. I
guess it's about finding the time / forum. For my particular modelling
question, I am happy with the solution filed above. Eventually, though
yes finding these border relations between family models should come
on to the work horizon!
I think we should first review D1 and CRMDig, see how it fits to
the definitions from the PARTHENOS project. Then, we should
identify a set of issues, in particular check the
boundaries and overlaps with the other CRM extensions.
I'd rather take a digital object to be one that has an exhaustive
representation in binary format, regardless whether this is done
in cuneiform script or on electronic media.
You mean it is 'persistent'... in the Parthenos sense?
Yes...
Since there are subtle implementation issues about where to stop
ontological representation and use data objects directly within a
KB, we should also finish the issue about how to represent a file.
Also would be great to have a FAQ on this since everyone does it
differently. Maybe if we have time in the agenda at next SIG?
I'd support that!
Best
Martin
Best,
George
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Vox:+30(2810)391625
Email: mar...@ics.forth.gr
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
