Dear all, A question came up in the Linked Art group today about the intent of "causal" in the scope not for P14 carried out by.
The scope note reads, in its entirety: This property describes the active participation of an instance of E39 Actor in an instance of E7 Activity. It implies causal or legal responsibility. The *P14.1 in the role of *property of the property specifies the nature of an Actor’s participation. The particular scenario being discussed was the baptism of a child and whether it could be said that the baby carried out the activity or was merely a participant or present. The child is a necessary participant in the activity, but does that make their participation "causal"? Whether the child is actively or passively participating seems difficult to determine so we didn't rule P14 out on those grounds. For such an important property, I think we could easily improve the scope note :) Rob -- Rob Sanderson Director for Cultural Heritage Metadata Yale University
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
