I propose that E35 Title also does not legitimately rise to the requirements of being a named class in CRM Base.
In particular: * It does not have its own properties * While it is the range of P102, P102 is indistinguishable semantically from its super-property, P1. Read the scope notes and replace "title" with "name" and it comes out the same. If that is *not* the case, then we would need a property that relates E1 and E33_E41_Linguistic_Appellation, at which point we would need to give a number of E33_E41. * It can be replaced without semantic loss by E33_E41_Linguistic_Appellation, perhaps further clarified by the addition of domain specific vocabulary (supplied title vs artist's title) using P2_has_type * It does not have any sub-classes. And so, it can safely be deleted. Rob -- Rob Sanderson Director for Cultural Heritage Metadata Yale University
_______________________________________________ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
