Yes I agree mostly, but being an early M4 and we just got our build fixed, I put it there and if it gets used, easier for our testing, but no big deal if it doesn't. Sorry for the monkey wrench. I agree they should match.
...Beth Beth Tibbitts Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform http://eclipse.org/ptp IBM STG - High Performance Computing Tools Mailing Address: IBM Corp., 745 West New Circle Road, Lexington, KY 40511 From: David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, Date: 12/15/2011 12:36 AM Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Juno M4 staging repo is done (more on respins and EPP) Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org It could be argued this is "none of my business" and entirely up to Markus and the PTP project ... but ... I can't help myself ... and maybe my comments will help set future expectations or processes. The staging (and soon milestone) repo and the EPP packages are meant to match exactly. EPP pulls from staging repo. Normally. If an exception is required, Markus has some ways he can "hack" the normal process and do something different on a case by case basis, but I'd think it'd be best to mention what serious bug it is required to fix and justify the extra effort and risks. And, in many cases, if it was that serious, it would probably justify a respin of the common repo too. There is some risk in having them different, least of all that users can get different things from different sources ... some risk, not to mention that does not sound very "coordinated" ... the whole point of a "simultaneous release train". I know, in the past, exceptions have been made that were considered "a bad enough bug for EPP but not bad enough for common repo", but I'd think these should be rare ... and justified in a bugzilla for all to read why it might be justifiable in one case, but not another. Don't get me wrong ... it might well be the best thing to do in this case ... but a) should normally be rare, and b) should be explained and linked to a specific bug. Thanks for reading, From: Beth Tibbitts/Watson/IBM@IBMUS To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, Date: 12/14/2011 09:34 PM Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Juno M4 staging repo is done Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org We have a respin of PTP in place but too late for Juno M4 repo. I think it should make the EPP build tomorrow though. ...Beth Beth Tibbitts Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform http://eclipse.org/ptp IBM STG - High Performance Computing Tools Mailing Address: IBM Corp., 745 West New Circle Road, Lexington, KY 40511 Inactive hide details for David M Williams---12/14/2011 08:32:35 PM---All did go fine and I re-promoted one more aggregation buDavid M Williams---12/14/2011 08:32:35 PM---All did go fine and I re-promoted one more aggregation build (the one from 6:33 started by Adolfo) a From: David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, Date: 12/14/2011 08:32 PM Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Juno M4 staging repo is done Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org All did go fine and I re-promoted one more aggregation build (the one from 6:33 started by Adolfo) and since there were no other requests for "respin" or blocking problems, we'll consider this part of M4 done. Tomorrow (Thursday) the focus will be on EPP ... and assuming that goes fine ... we'll make both available Friday. (usually, 9 to noonish, Eastern Time). Thanks all ... remember, test early, test often ... oh, and remember this time our /releases/juno repo will contain _only_ M4 (rather than a composite of last 3) since a key bundle package went "down" in version numbering, so that means you can start testing /releases/staging and expect same results and behavior for final M4 repo. From: Adolfo Sanchez Barbudo <adolfo...@opencanarias.com> To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, Date: 12/14/2011 06:33 PM Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook near end of M4 +3 Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org BTW, If all goes fine, as I expect, I'd be pleased to have the new result promoted for packaging. Cheers, Adolfo. 2011/12/14 Adolfo Sanchez Barbudo <adolfo...@opencanarias.com> David, I have just run a build with some last bits for OCL Tools. Cheers, Adolfo. 2011/12/14 David M Williams <david_willi...@us.ibm.com> Roll call ... I think the last aggregation build got all the latest changes/additions for M4, but please speak up now if your contribution isn't there yet. I promoted the latest results to /releases/staging so you can check/test there, if all is as expected. If anyone needs to contribute by 7 PM Eastern, I'd think that'd be containable ... after that, I'd begin to ask if better to wait to M5, or other more specific questions. Oh, and you don't really need to answer "roll call" unless there's problems ... like my teachers used to say "if anyone is not here, will you please speak up?" :) _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
<<inline: graycol.gif>>
<<inline: ecblank.gif>>
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev