The Hudson UI had been very responsive since these changes were made. I haven't seen any network timeouts either when trying to contact slaves. Kudos to all those involved in making these improvements. Much appreciated!
Kim From: Winston Prakash <winston.prak...@gmail.com> To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> Date: 02/28/2012 03:47 PM Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson Jetty conversion Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Let me clarify, what I meant by "bundled" (I think the correct word is embedded) and "standalone". You can use the hudson.war two ways Just run the war as a regular executable jar using java -jar hudson.war. In this case it uses the jetty jars bundled with in the war and starts an embedded jetty which in turn uses the hudson.war itself Server server = new Server(); URL warUrl = protectionDomain.getCodeSource().getLocation(); WebAppContext context = new WebAppContext(); context.setWar(warUrl.toExternalForm()); .. server.start(); Other way (which Matt is doing now), drop the war file in a "webapps" folder of a normal Jetty distribution. Wondering if there is any performance difference between the above two. - Winston On 2/28/12 12:16 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote: > not sure what is meant by 'bundled' vs 'standalone' really > > maybe osgi vs normal distribution? or embedded vs normal distribution? > > in those cases there shouldn't be any real default difference, osgi > has its natural bit of classloader muckity muck muck but in terms of > processing of a request from start to finish...not that I know of. > > more info on what is meant by 'bundled' vs 'standalone' would help > clarify that though > > cheers, > jesse > > -- > jesse mcconnell > jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com > > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 14:08, Winston Prakash > <winston.prak...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 2/28/12 11:42 AM, Webmaster(Matt Ward) wrote: >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> I know it's short notice but as it's quiet for Hudson this week I'm going >>> to move us off the Winstone servlet and onto Jetty. I've got everything >>> ready to go so at 4pm I'll shut Hudson down and then startup the Jetty >>> instance. I expect we'll be offline for about 10 minutes. >> >> Nice. Good news is, for Hudson 3.0.0 we don't have to do this, because we >> replaced Winstone with Jetty as a bundled server. >> >> I'm interested to know, from Jetty folks, if there is a difference between >> Jetty bundled server and Standlone server in terms of performance. >> >> - Winston >> >>> -Matt. >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list >> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev > _______________________________________________ > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list > cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
