Hi, Am 24.05.2012 09:19, schrieb Dennis Hübner: > Sure there are greedy optional dependencies in the repository, because > it often just intended by projects. I don't understand, why are you > talking about *incorrect* greediness? "Not a default" it not the same as > "wrong". > IMHO this [1] report is only useful for statistic purpose.
If it's really *intended* then the bundles should be listed under "Optional runtime requirement with explicit greedy install." in the report (or under "new publisher default" if optional dependencies are included via feature.xml). There are currently 337 bundles using the "old publisher default". If the build system producing those bundles is updated to the new publisher their installation behavior will change. With the new publisher their optional dependencies will *not* be installed automatically anymore. Thus, if installation of optional dependencies is really *intended* then either greedy instructions must be added to p2.inf files or the optional dependencies must be included within a feature.xml. -Gunnar -- Gunnar Wagenknecht gun...@wagenknecht.org http://wagenknecht.org/ _______________________________________________ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
