Sure, but there doesn't seem to be any consensus there. In fact, there
doesn't seem to be widespread agreement that distributed signing is even
desirable.
Our signing infra has become much simpler to use [I agree the old way
was clunky but it was all I could muster up at the time]. We'll also be
deploying Windows and Mac signing shortly using our cert. That has to be
worth something.
Denis
On 11/08/2012 03:42 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=354756
and you even have the last nitpik comment on there :)
regardless, thanks for restarting, I actually have a p2 repo for
latest jetty 8 release \o/
cheers,
jesse
--
jesse mcconnell
[email protected]
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Denis Roy <[email protected]> wrote:
I don't actually think about it that much, since I gave up trying to read
minds the day I got married.
However, if you have non-silly ways of signing to suggest, I'm all ears.
Right now you submit a file to an internal web service and get a signed file
back. I'm not sure how easier it can get.
Denis
On 11/08/2012 03:19 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
Why do you think we stopped using this hudson setup except for the
single job that requires the silly signing setup you guys wired up?
*pppssbbt*
--
jesse mcconnell
[email protected]
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Denis Roy <[email protected]> wrote:
As a Jetty user I thought you'd be used to that by now :-D
</ducks>
On 11/08/2012 03:01 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
i have had this on and off throughout the day
--
jesse mcconnell
[email protected]
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik
<[email protected]> wrote:
Requests to hudson.eclipse.org are hanging. I am able to access
www.eclipse.org just fine.
- Konstantin
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
