I'll turn aggregator back "on" on Friday ... but ... projects can verify 
their own stuff, without waiting for the main aggregation build. 
See 
http://wiki.eclipse.org/SimRel/Simultaneous_Release_Reports_Running_Locally





From:   Alexey Panchenko <alex.panche...@gmail.com>
To:     Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>, 
Date:   06/06/2013 08:36 AM
Subject:        Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Missing release information

for some Kepler projects
Sent by:        cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org



Hi,

I've finally managed to updated DLTK contribution to the latest build.
When it will be picked up by the release process, to verify the results?

Regards,
Alex


On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Jacek Pospychała <
jacek.pospych...@gmail.com> wrote:
hi, 

PDT has been building and testing against DLTK-nightly builds for last 
months, so we prefer DLTK 5.0.

thanks,
Jacek


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Alexey Panchenko <alex.panche...@gmail.com
> wrote:
Hi,

Unfortunately The DLTK team were quite busy this year with other projects.

Initially the previous (4.0, released 2012) version was added to Kepler, 
with the intent to replace it later with the 5.0 builds from master. So 
far, that did not happen yet, partly because of source control (-> git) & 
build system (-> tycho) changes.

AFAIK DLTK is used by PDT and Koneki-Lua Development Tools.
So the question to these projects: what DLTK version would you prefer in 
Kepler?

Regards,
Alex


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Wayne Beaton <wa...@eclipse.org> wrote:
I am now only missing the information for the DLTK and Runtime Packaging 
(RTP) project. I have contacted DLTK via their mailing list; Ian has 
contacted the RTP project leaders directly (thanks, Ian).

I noticed that DLTK is contributing their 4.0 release build (from Juno) to

Kepler, despite there being some apparent activity in the project Git 
repositories. I don't know if there is any specific issue with this, but 
thought that I'd point it out in case any downstream consumers had any 
concerns/issues.

Thanks,


Wayne

On 04/26/2013 02:38 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
I am missing release information for the following projects that have 
declared intent to participate in Kepler.

C/C++ Development Tools (CDT)
Dynamic Languages Toolkit (DLTK)
Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF)
Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF)
Runtime Packaging Project (RTP)
EclipseLink
Ecore Tools
Extended Editing Framework (EEF)
Jubula Functional Testing Tool
MDT XSD (XML Schema Definition)
Maven Integration for Web Tools Platform
SCA Tools

In some cases, it may be that I just can't sort out what release you want 
to include, or maybe you're planning to include a release that does not 
occur on the Kepler release date (which I find weird, but is otherwise 
okay). 

If you have not done so already, please visit your project's information 
page and create a release record for Kepler and then please let me know 
either on this list or via direct email so that I can update the Kepler 
release page.

I will not accept review documentation for any release that is not 
recorded in the project metadata.

While you're there, please take a few minutes to update the description 
and plan information for your release. The description should be a  short 
paragraph that concisely describes the high points of the release. Note 
that you can still use the old XML-file based plan format if you like 
using old and painful technology.

You can quickly get access to your project's information page directly 
from the Kepler release page:

https://projects.eclipse.org/releases/kepler

Let me know if you require any assistance.

Wayne
-- 
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
Learn about Eclipse Projects



_________________________
______________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


-- 
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
Learn about Eclipse Projects


_________________________
______________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



_________________________
______________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



_________________________
______________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

_________________________
______________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

<<image/png>>

<<image/png>>

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to