Wayne,
seems your 3 search queries are private ("The search named Mars Waiting IP
Log Submission does not exist.")
Fred
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Wayne Beaton <wa...@eclipse.org> wrote:
> Greetings folks. Before I say anything else, let me start with this:
> don't panic.
>
> I have received the required PMC Approval of the review materials and IP
> Team approval of the IP Logs for most of the projects participating in the
> Mars release.
>
> If I have everything that I need from you, your project will appear in the
> project activity list [1] under June 10 reviews. Thank you for your
> attention in this matter of process and please seek me out if you want a
> beer or something at EclipseCon.
>
> As most of you have likely discovered, I use bugs to track each release
> review [2]. I've created a couple of different queries to help me keep
> track of what we're waiting for.
>
> I'm still waiting on PMC Approval of the review materials from several
> projects [3]. I am either waiting for IP Logs or am waiting for responses
> regarding questions about IP Logs from several projects [4]. If your
> project is on one of these lists, you need to take action now. You've
> missed the deadline participate in the June 10 review and are very late for
> IP Log reviews for a June 17 review. *Immediate action is required if you
> intend to release with Mars.* Maybe you can panic a little,..
>
> If I've missed something, please first accept my humble apology, then be
> kind in consideration of how mindnumbing processing a bajillion IP Logs can
> be, and let me know what I've missed so that I can take the necessary steps
> to remediate.
>
> While I have your attention...
>
> Those of you who created your own review records may have noticed that the
> available dates for reviews has been made a little more restrictive. Moving
> forward, we are only scheduling reviews on first and third Wednesdays of
> the month. I'll admit that the timing of the change could have been better
> (I probably should have waited until post Mars) Exceptions may be permitted
> at my discretion, but only with input from the PMC. My preference is to
> give projects as much flexibility as possible, but, frankly, we've been
> running far too many review periods over the last year or so and I just
> don't have the bandwidth to continue to do weekly reviews.
>
> Finally, I'd like to take this opportunity to remind you that IP tracking
> needs to be current and complete at all times. You must obtain approval
> from the IP Team before you check in any third party code libraries or code
> contributions for which the IP due diligence process mandates an IP Team
> review. Git commits must correctly indicate the author of the contribution
> and all contributions by non-project-committers must be signed off. If you
> have any questions about this, please ask your project mentors, project
> lead, PMC members, or me.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Wayne
>
> [1] https://www.eclipse.org/projects/project_activity.php
> [2] http://eclip.se/4t
> [3] http://eclip.se/4s
> [4] http://eclip.se/4v
>
> --
> Wayne Beaton
> @waynebeaton
> The Eclipse Foundation
> [image: EclipseCon France 2015] <http://www.eclipsecon.org/france2015>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
--
"Have you tried turning it off and on again" - The IT Crowd
And if that fails, then http://goo.gl/tnBgH5
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
