Hey!

Quick question:
why do those update sites refer to the latest S or R builds AS WELL AS a 
specific release repo from 2020 ?

The content of the latest-S looks like:

<child location="../drops/R20201118194144/repository"/>
<child location="../drops2/S20220215213605/repository“/>

Any idea why the R20201118194144 repo is included here?

Cheers
Martin



> Am 24.02.2022 um 06:47 schrieb Ed Willink <ed.will...@gmail.com>:
> 
> Hi
> 
> For those needing to update: Orbit now has:
> 
>     <repository 
> location="https://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/latest-S"; 
> <https://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/latest-S>/>
>     <repository 
> location="https://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/latest-R"; 
> <https://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/latest-R>/>
> 
> so there is no need to update ever again. Just rebuild.
> 
>     Regards
> 
>         Ed Willink
> 
> On 24/02/2022 02:13, Jonah Graham wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> I have now checked and the EPP packages that have org.apache.log4j now have 
>> the 1.2.19 reload4j version.
>> 
>> Some progress has already been made on the bugs, so with a bit more work we 
>> can have the whole simrel free of the 1.2.15 version of log4j.
>> 
>> However, individual projects need to update to the newest Orbit version and 
>> rebuild. Numerous projects still have the 1.2.15 version in their p2 repos.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Jonah
>> 
>> ~~~
>> Jonah Graham
>> Kichwa Coders
>> www.kichwacoders.com <http://www.kichwacoders.com/>
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 12:22, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com 
>> <mailto:jo...@kichwacoders.com>> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> The SimRel release will include the reload4j version of the bundle. Most p2 
>> install resolutions will pull in the reload4j version. 
>> 
>> However it also includes the 1.2.15 version because of some hard 
>> dependencies on the 1.2.15 version (Bug 578940 
>> <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=578940> Bug 578941 
>> <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=578941>)
>> 
>> When I do the EPP build I will verify/report whether any of the packages 
>> contain the 1.2.15 version.
>> 
>> Jonah
>> 
>> 
>> ~~~
>> Jonah Graham
>> Kichwa Coders
>> www.kichwacoders.com <http://www.kichwacoders.com/>
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 03:04, Dirk Fauth via cross-project-issues-dev 
>> <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>> wrote:
>> Just as an information for people that did not get the current status via 
>> other channels.
>> 
>> The re-bundled version of reload4j is available in the latest stable build 
>> of Eclipse Orbit. 
>> 
>> Logpresso has added handling for the re-bundled variant and will not detect 
>> the vulnerability in its latest version. 
>> 
>> Christian Dietrich <christian.dietr...@itemis.de 
>> <mailto:christian.dietr...@itemis.de>> schrieb am Di., 8. Feb. 2022, 17:18:
>> yes i tried to use the pomDependencies consider features
>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/orbit/orbit-recipes/+/190576 
>> <https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/orbit/orbit-recipes/+/190576>
>> https://ci.eclipse.org/orbit/job/gerrit-orbit-recipes/1782/artifact/releng/repository-all/target/repository/
>>  
>> <https://ci.eclipse.org/orbit/job/gerrit-orbit-recipes/1782/artifact/releng/repository-all/target/repository/>
>> but i get signing warning and also naming conventions etc
>> are completely "bogus"
>> 
>> Am 08.02.22 um 17:16 schrieb Ed Merks:
>>> Christian,
>>> 
>>> I assume it is not jar signed but rather only has an external PGP signature.
>>> 
>>> Regards,...
>>> Ed
>>> 
>>> On 08.02.2022 16:48, Christian Dietrich wrote:
>>>> is the orginal signing not enhough? 
>>>> and what about about.html and other eclipse rule foo.
>>>> 
>>>> Am 08.02.22 um 16:32 schrieb Matthias Sohn:
>>>>> I went ahead and pushed the naive addition of reload4j 1.2.19 disguised 
>>>>> as bundle org.apache.log4j to Orbit
>>>>> https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/orbit/orbit-recipes/+/190574 
>>>>> <https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/orbit/orbit-recipes/+/190574>
>>>>> feel free to change this if someone finds out how to use EBR to only sign 
>>>>> the upstream artefact.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 4:04 PM Dirk Fauth via cross-project-issues-dev 
>>>>> <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
>>>>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>> wrote:
>>>>> Well, from my point of view the usage of reload4j is the only backwards 
>>>>> compatible solution. Unfortunately not for every case, e.g. too strict 
>>>>> version ranges. The solution forward is of course the usage of a log 
>>>>> wrapper to decouple development from deployment.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Anyhow I don't know how to add a bundle jar signed and unchanged to 
>>>>> Orbit. I am only aware of the re-bundling via EBR. Doing that will cause 
>>>>> a change in the jar structure that causes for example logpresso to 
>>>>> identify a CVE, although it is fixed. Which is actually only an issue in 
>>>>> the detection. But that was one of the reasons why I contacted the 
>>>>> reload4j project to change the base to avoid the re-bundling. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Anyone who knows how to only sign and publish to Orbit without 
>>>>> re-bundling? 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ed Merks <ed.me...@gmail.com <mailto:ed.me...@gmail.com>> schrieb am Di., 
>>>>> 8. Feb. 2022, 15:54:
>>>>> Dirk,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks.  That's really great!  It would be great for this release cycle 
>>>>> if it were jar signed and available from Orbit so that we could ship it 
>>>>> with 2022-03...
>>>>> 
>>>>> There are people who are concerned:
>>>>> 
>>>>>   
>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/mv/msg/1109656/1849775/#msg_1849775
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/mv/msg/1109656/1849775/#msg_1849775>
>>>>> Though I'm not sure if they would consider the problem being fixed in 
>>>>> 1.2.19 a fact and even if its a fact if it would be a fact that matters...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Ed
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 08.02.2022 15:48, Dirk Fauth via cross-project-issues-dev wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I got in contact with the reload4j team. They changed the 
>>>>>> Bundle-SymbolicName to org.apache.log4j and fixed several OSGi meta data 
>>>>>> related issues in the meanwhile. Today they published 1.2.19 which 
>>>>>> should work as a drop-in replacement in Eclipse based applications where 
>>>>>> Require-Bundle was used. My local tests worked so far.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That said, re-bundling for Orbit should not be necessary as reload4j 
>>>>>> could directly be consumed via Maven Central. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Just wanted to keep you updated. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Greez, 
>>>>>> Dirk 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ed Willink <ed.will...@gmail.com <mailto:ed.will...@gmail.com>> schrieb 
>>>>>> am Mi., 26. Jan. 2022, 13:47:
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 26/01/2022 07:48, Christoph Läubrich wrote:
>>>>>> > Why not using SLF4J in all places and let the user choose the 
>>>>>> > implementation with their favorite CVEs?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Use of SLF4J has been suggested before and so I tried to be a good 
>>>>>> Eclipse citizen. My failed attempts are described in:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=559532 
>>>>>> <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=559532>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If SLF4J is to be used, can someone please ensure that the platform is 
>>>>>> fit for purpose and that there is a good tutorial on how to do really 
>>>>>> boring logging.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ed Willink
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
>>>>>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev 
>>>>>> <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
>>>>>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
>>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev 
>>>>>> <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
>>>>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev 
>>>>> <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
>>>>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev 
>>>>> <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
>>>>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
>>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev 
>>>>> <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>
>>>> 
>>>> Vorstand/Board: Jens Wagener (Vors./chairman), Dr. Stephan Eberle, 
>>>> Abdelghani El-Kacimi, Wolfgang Neuhaus, Franz-Josef Schuermann
>>>> Aufsichtsrat/Supervisory Board: Michael Neuhaus (Vors./chairman), Harald 
>>>> Goertz, Eric Swehla
>>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered Office: Am Brambusch 15-24, 44536 Lünen 
>>>> (Germany)
>>>> Registergericht/Registry Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund | HRB 20621
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
>>>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev 
>>>> <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
>>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev 
>>> <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>
>> 
>> Vorstand/Board: Jens Wagener (Vors./chairman), Dr. Stephan Eberle, 
>> Abdelghani El-Kacimi, Wolfgang Neuhaus, Franz-Josef Schuermann
>> Aufsichtsrat/Supervisory Board: Michael Neuhaus (Vors./chairman), Harald 
>> Goertz, Eric Swehla
>> Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered Office: Am Brambusch 15-24, 44536 Lünen 
>> (Germany)
>> Registergericht/Registry Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund | HRB 20621
>> _______________________________________________
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev 
>> <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev 
>> <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org 
>> <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev 
>> <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev>
> 
>  
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>     Virus-free. www.avast.com 
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>  
> <x-msg://18/#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>_______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to