Hi

Ouch!. It seems like these are manually maintained and so subject to human fallibility.

If "latest" is to be useful, it must be automatic.

It makes sense to reference multiple repos, as in my cut and paste from my S-build that referenced both latest-S and latest-R Orbit, since latest-S is usually the most recent except just after a release when latest-R may be later (unless a gratuitous S-build immediately followed the R-build).

However multiple explicit references seems crazy especially when they are so stale.

    Regards

        Ed Willink

On 24/02/2022 08:27, Martin Lippert wrote:
Hey!

Quick question:
why do those update sites refer to the latest S or R builds AS WELL AS a specific release repo from 2020 ?

The content of the latest-S looks like:

<child location="../drops/R20201118194144/repository"/>
<child location="../drops2/S20220215213605/repository“/>

Any idea why the R20201118194144 repo is included here?

Cheers
Martin



Am 24.02.2022 um 06:47 schrieb Ed Willink <ed.will...@gmail.com>:

Hi

For those needing to update: Orbit now has:

    <repository location="https://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/latest-S"/>     <repository location="https://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/latest-R"/>

so there is no need to update ever again. Just rebuild.

    Regards

        Ed Willink

On 24/02/2022 02:13, Jonah Graham wrote:
Hi folks,

I have now checked and the EPP packages that have org.apache.log4j now have the 1.2.19 reload4j version.

Some progress has already been made on the bugs, so with a bit more work we can have the whole simrel free of the 1.2.15 version of log4j.

However, individual projects need to update to the newest Orbit version and rebuild. Numerous projects still have the 1.2.15 version in their p2 repos.

Thanks,
Jonah

~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com <http://www.kichwacoders.com/>


On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 12:22, Jonah Graham <jo...@kichwacoders.com> wrote:

    Hi folks,

    The SimRel release will include the reload4j version of the
    bundle. Most p2 install resolutions will pull in the reload4j
    version.

    However it also includes the 1.2.15 version because of some hard
    dependencies on the 1.2.15 version (Bug 578940
    <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=578940> Bug
    578941 <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=578941>)

    When I do the EPP build I will verify/report whether any of the
    packages contain the 1.2.15 version.

    Jonah


    ~~~
    Jonah Graham
    Kichwa Coders
    www.kichwacoders.com <http://www.kichwacoders.com/>


    On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 03:04, Dirk Fauth via
    cross-project-issues-dev <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org>
    wrote:

        Just as an information for people that did not get the
        current status via other channels.

        The re-bundled version of reload4j is available in the
        latest stable build of Eclipse Orbit.

        Logpresso has added handling for the re-bundled variant and
        will not detect the vulnerability in its latest version.

        Christian Dietrich <christian.dietr...@itemis.de> schrieb am
        Di., 8. Feb. 2022, 17:18:

            yes i tried to use the pomDependencies consider features
            https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/orbit/orbit-recipes/+/190576
            
https://ci.eclipse.org/orbit/job/gerrit-orbit-recipes/1782/artifact/releng/repository-all/target/repository/
            but i get signing warning and also naming conventions etc
            are completely "bogus"

            Am 08.02.22 um 17:16 schrieb Ed Merks:

            Christian,

            I *assume *it is not jar signed but rather only has an
            external PGP signature.

            Regards,...
            Ed

            On 08.02.2022 16:48, Christian Dietrich wrote:

            is the orginal signing not enhough?
            and what about about.html and other eclipse rule foo.

            Am 08.02.22 um 16:32 schrieb Matthias Sohn:
            I went ahead and pushed the naive addition of
            reload4j 1.2.19 disguised as bundle org.apache.log4j
            to Orbit
            https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/orbit/orbit-recipes/+/190574
            feel free to change this if someone finds out how to
            use EBR to only sign the upstream artefact.
            -Matthias

            On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 4:04 PM Dirk Fauth via
            cross-project-issues-dev
            <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org> wrote:

                Well, from my point of view the usage of reload4j
                is the only backwards compatible solution.
                Unfortunately not for every case, e.g. too strict
                version ranges. The solution forward is of course
                the usage of a log wrapper to decouple
                development from deployment.

                Anyhow I don't know how to add a bundle jar
                signed and unchanged to Orbit. I am only aware of
                the re-bundling via EBR. Doing that will cause a
                change in the jar structure that causes for
                example logpresso to identify a CVE, although it
                is fixed. Which is actually only an issue in the
                detection. But that was one of the reasons why I
                contacted the reload4j project to change the base
                to avoid the re-bundling.

                Anyone who knows how to only sign and publish to
                Orbit without re-bundling?

                Ed Merks <ed.me...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di., 8.
                Feb. 2022, 15:54:

                    Dirk,

                    Thanks. That's really great! It would be
                    great for this release cycle if it were jar
                    signed and available from Orbit so that we
                    could ship it with 2022-03...

                    There are people who are concerned:

                    
https://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/mv/msg/1109656/1849775/#msg_1849775

                    Though I'm not sure if they would consider
                    the problem being fixed in 1.2.19 a fact and
                    even if its a fact if it would be a fact that
                    matters...

                    Regards,
                    Ed

                    On 08.02.2022 15:48, Dirk Fauth via
                    cross-project-issues-dev wrote:
                    Hi,

                    I got in contact with the reload4j team.
                    They changed the Bundle-SymbolicName to
                    org.apache.log4j and fixed several OSGi meta
                    data related issues in the meanwhile. Today
                    they published 1.2.19 which should work as a
                    drop-in replacement in Eclipse based
                    applications where Require-Bundle was used.
                    My local tests worked so far.

                    That said, re-bundling for Orbit should not
                    be necessary as reload4j could directly be
                    consumed via Maven Central.

                    Just wanted to keep you updated.

                    Greez,
                    Dirk

                    Ed Willink <ed.will...@gmail.com> schrieb am
                    Mi., 26. Jan. 2022, 13:47:

                        Hi

                        On 26/01/2022 07:48, Christoph Läubrich
                        wrote:
                        > Why not using SLF4J in all places and
                        let the user choose the
                        > implementation with their favorite CVEs?

                        Use of SLF4J has been suggested before
                        and so I tried to be a good
                        Eclipse citizen. My failed attempts are
                        described in:

                        https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=559532

                        If SLF4J is to be used, can someone
                        please ensure that the platform is
                        fit for purpose and that there is a good
                        tutorial on how to do really
                        boring logging.

                        Regards

                        Ed Willink


-- This email has been checked for viruses
                        by Avast antivirus software.
                        https://www.avast.com/antivirus

                        _______________________________________________
                        cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
                        cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
                        To unsubscribe from this list, visit
                        
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


                    _______________________________________________
                    cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
                    cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
                    To unsubscribe from this list, 
visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
                    _______________________________________________
                    cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
                    cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
                    To unsubscribe from this list, visit
                    
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

                _______________________________________________
                cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
                cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
                To unsubscribe from this list, visit
                
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


            _______________________________________________
            cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
            cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
            To unsubscribe from this list, 
visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

            Vorstand/Board: Jens Wagener (Vors./chairman), Dr.
            Stephan Eberle, Abdelghani El-Kacimi, Wolfgang
            Neuhaus, Franz-Josef Schuermann
            Aufsichtsrat/Supervisory Board: Michael Neuhaus
            (Vors./chairman), Harald Goertz, Eric Swehla
            Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered Office: Am Brambusch
            15-24, 44536 Lünen (Germany)
            Registergericht/Registry Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund |
            HRB 20621

            _______________________________________________
            cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
            cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
            To unsubscribe from this list, 
visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

            _______________________________________________
            cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
            cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
            To unsubscribe from this list, 
visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

            Vorstand/Board: Jens Wagener (Vors./chairman), Dr.
            Stephan Eberle, Abdelghani El-Kacimi, Wolfgang Neuhaus,
            Franz-Josef Schuermann
            Aufsichtsrat/Supervisory Board: Michael Neuhaus
            (Vors./chairman), Harald Goertz, Eric Swehla
            Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered Office: Am Brambusch
            15-24, 44536 Lünen (Germany)
            Registergericht/Registry Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund |
            HRB 20621
            _______________________________________________
            cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
            cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
            To unsubscribe from this list, visit
            https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

        _______________________________________________
        cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
        cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
        To unsubscribe from this list, visit
        https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, 
visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>

<x-msg://18/#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, 
visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Reply via email to