Alex Schultz wrote: >Yes, this indeed a current revision control issue. Personally I try to >keep to the former of those two and avoid the later like the plague. >Then try to minimize the affect, instead of making monolithic changes, >figuring out a way to split a large task into many subtasks, as many of >the subtasks as possible being usable for purposes other than the larger >task too (i.e. what I've been doing for land plots and required >features). However that is not always possible to split like that and >even then some sort of revision control on "local branches" would be good. > Adding to what I just said, perhaps some developer usage of svk ( http://svk.elixus.org/ ) would be helpful for local branches. It is capable of syncing with both svn and cvs (not sure how good such syncing with cvs is for local branches, but apparently it's great for svn).
Alex Schultz _______________________________________________ crossfire mailing list crossfire@metalforge.org http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
