On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Matt Wynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * There's a branch on github
> here: http://github.com/benburkert/cruisecontrolrb/tree/master which I've
> got working with our git repo. yay!
> * But then I saw a post from Jeremy Lightsmith very recently on this list
> (http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-users/2008-August/000560.html)
> pointing to the new github
> branch: http://github.com/thoughtworks/cruisecontrol.rb

I'll tell you what I can.

I think that benburkert's should be changed to a branch off the new
"official" one, but not sure if that is possible/hard on GitHub.  From
what I've heard, should be possible if all the branches are deleted?

> So what's the git support like in the new thoughtworks github repo? Should I
> move over to that?

I've found some bugs which I reported on Lighthouse (and tagged with
git), and referenced in a recent thread on this list.  I think
benburkert's may be more stable, but it uses Grit, which has native
dependencies.  This has been discussed on a separate thread as well.
Not sure of the latest status on everything, no updates on those
threads...

-- Chad
_______________________________________________
Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users

Reply via email to