Thanks Chad. I guess I'll stick with benburkert's version for the
time being then, and watch here for updates.
cheers,
Matt
On 8 Aug 2008, at 12:55, Chad Woolley wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Matt Wynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* There's a branch on github
here: http://github.com/benburkert/cruisecontrolrb/tree/master
which I've
got working with our git repo. yay!
* But then I saw a post from Jeremy Lightsmith very recently on
this list
(http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-users/2008-August/
000560.html)
pointing to the new github
branch: http://github.com/thoughtworks/cruisecontrol.rb
I'll tell you what I can.
I think that benburkert's should be changed to a branch off the new
"official" one, but not sure if that is possible/hard on GitHub. From
what I've heard, should be possible if all the branches are deleted?
So what's the git support like in the new thoughtworks github
repo? Should I
move over to that?
I've found some bugs which I reported on Lighthouse (and tagged with
git), and referenced in a recent thread on this list. I think
benburkert's may be more stable, but it uses Grit, which has native
dependencies. This has been discussed on a separate thread as well.
Not sure of the latest status on everything, no updates on those
threads...
-- Chad
_______________________________________________
Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users
_______________________________________________
Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users
