Steve Mynott wrote: > > There used to be two keys I believe a little (weak) key and a larger (strong) > key. In the (patched to domestic US strength) version of Netscape I use > (Linux 4.07) the padlock is always the same size. It may be my version > is broken. > > Anyone with a legit. US browser confirm that this visual cue (icon > size) has been removed? Up through 3.0, we used a key with one tooth for weak crypto and a key with two teeth for strong crypto. In 4.0, the UI people changed it to a padlock. Although we complained bitterly, they never put in any visual distinction between weak and strong crypto, although most of the code to do it is still there. -- What is appropriate for the master is not appropriate| Tom Weinstein for the novice. You must understand Tao before | [EMAIL PROTECTED] transcending structure. -- The Tao of Programming |
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES... Adam Shostack
- write code outside US (Re: so why is IETF ... Adam Back
- Re: write code outside US (Re: so why ... Tom Weinstein
- Re: write code outside US (Re: so why ... Sameer Parekh
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to ... Eivind Eklund
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to ... Bodo Moeller
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to ... Ulf Möller
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES... John Gilmore
- Re: so why is IETF stilling addin... Nelson Minar
- Padlock Size was Re: so why i... Steve Mynott
- Re: Padlock Size was Re: so w... Tom Weinstein
- Re: Padlock Size was Re: so w... Dan Geer
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES... Adam Shostack
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to protocols? (R... Adam Back
- RE: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to protocol... Phill Hallam-Baker
- Re: so why is IETF stilling adding DES to prot... Bodo Moeller