On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Ben Laurie wrote: > > The brief summary of the above is that it's possible to simply replace > > /dev/random with something which doesn't deplete entropy and the problem > > will go away. And yes, it is possible to do that in a secure manner. > > So what you are saying is that you'd be happy to run your server forever > on an inital charge of 128 bits of entropy and no more randomness ever? > > Really? Well, I simplified a bit - it's a good idea to mix in more entropy whenever it's available just for good measure, and pool it to be introduced in large enough chunks to prevent continuation attacks, but the short answer is yes. -Bram
- Re: depleting the random number generator James A. Donald
- Re: depleting the random number generator David Honig
- Re: depleting the random number generator Ben Laurie
- Re: depleting the random number generator Bill Stewart
- Re: depleting the random number generator Ben Laurie
- RE: depleting the random number generator Enzo Michelangeli
- RE: depleting the random number generator bram
- Re: depleting the random number generator Ben Laurie
- Re: depleting the random number generator bram
- Re: depleting the random number generator James A. Donald
- Re: depleting the random number genera... Arnold G. Reinhold
- Re: depleting the random number g... David Wagner
- Re: depleting the random numb... James A. Donald
- Re: depleting the random numb... bram
- Re: depleting the random numb... James A. Donald
- Re: depleting the random numb... John Kelsey
- Summary re: /dev/random Sandy Harris
- Proposal (was Summary re: /de... Sandy Harris
- Re: Proposal (was Summary re:... bram