> > Are you saying that there are existing encryption programs for the > > Pilot or that there are better languages to program it in? (Basic > > really isn't bad for something like RC4) > > If I understand it correctly, there exists a Pilot C (C++ ?) development > suite for Windows from Metrowerks. And there are development tools (cross-compiler & emulator) for unix as well. > [...] > Indeed. Thats why I originally coded MD5 on my 92, I was going to > put together an S/key calculator for it. But then the need for S/key > thankfully went away, and my remote-access needs switched entirely > to SSH. My pilot has both ssh and pgp on it, as well as an s/key calculator. All this stuff is out there, and free! (I feel the moderator's scissors closing on this thread....) Matt
- Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness flaw? Dave Del Torto
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness flaw? William H. Geiger III
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness flaw... Arnold Reinhold
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness ... mgraffam
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomn... Arnold Reinhold
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare ra... Paul Crowley
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare ra... Bill Stewart
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiar... Arnold Reinhold
- crypto on calculators mgraffam
- Re: crypto on calculat... Matt Crawford
- Re: crypto on calculat... Bill Stewart
- Re: crypto on calculat... Bill Frantz
- Re: crypto on calculat... Alan Olsen
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomn... Thomas W. Kellar
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare ra... Arnold Reinhold
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness ... Anonymous
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomn... Anonymous
- Re: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness flaw? amanda
- RE: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness flaw? Kuehn, Ulrich
- RE: Paul Brown on Solitiare randomness flaw... Arnold Reinhold