>No, October 28, 2000 is when the act of circumventing an effective >technological measure becomes a violation (with exceptions for fair But if it was an "effective technological measure", it couldn't have been circumvented. And by circumventing CSS, wasn't it shown to not be an effective technological measure?? Phil
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report Andreas Bogk
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report Ted Lemon
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report Ray Hirschfeld
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report bram
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report Eivind Eklund
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report Martin Minow
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report Eivind Eklund
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report Ray Hirschfeld
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report bram
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report Ray Hirschfeld
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report Phil Karn
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report John Gilmore
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report bram
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report David Honig
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report Sameer Parekh
- Re: DeCSS Court Hearing Report Andreas Bogk